Switching between gimp and photoshop can be a bit confusing to your workflow and your better off spending your time learning how to use one. There is nothing wrong with gimp, it can do much of what photoshop. I don't see any reason to use GIMP over Photoshop unless you are a diehard GNU/free software advocate(yea PS costs money, pirate it like every one else unless/until you are using it to sell art). Smart Objects are one feature of the top of my head. If you don't do a lot and just need something to throw something together every couple of weeks, GIMP is your program. If you do much image editing at all, the little extra time it takes to download Photoshop CS6 and copy the crack file over is definitely worth it. psd files? Probably not) and marketability (If you ever hope to do something professionally).Īll that being said, which one do you use? Yes, GIMP is free and Photoshop costs upwards of a grand, but Adobe doesn't do much to prevent piracy (because they make their money from corporate licensing, not the average joe user), and Photoshop is the much better program. Those are just a few of the differences that I can think of off the top of my head, but there are other things like file interoperability (does GIMP work perfectly with. This is a smaller thing for most users (Although it can be a deal breaker for some) is the lack of CMYK and higher bit depth support. While Text support in GIMP has improved dramatically from 2.4 to 2.6, it still isn't on par with what Photoshop offers. If you're going to use a graphics tablet, you have to use Photoshop. Photoshop's drawing tablet support is miles beyond what GIMP offers. Photoshop makes this very easy, GIMP, not so much. Now, I tend to do a lot of photo touchup work, where I sometimes need to delete entire objects from the picture. GIMP has clone stamp, heal (same as repair), perspective clone. Ps CS6 has clone stamp, repair, spot repair, stitch, smart fill (this is black magic, I swear). Tool selection is very limited when compared to photoshop, especially in the touchup/repair categories. I'm guessing they finally added in single window mode to the stable release, 17 years after it should have been there. But anyway, the UI is terrible, full stop. I haven't used the GIMP in a couple of years, so this might have changed a little, but in my experience the development of the program has been glacier-slow. Yes, both will get you where you want to go (maybe), but you're going to get there a lot faster in the Ferrari than in the minivan. Oh and incidentally they are working on adding increased colordepth support to GIMP and then also CMYK, but of course there is no telling how long it'll take and it's a bit of a sidenote at this point.Ĭomparing Photoshop to the GIMP is like comparing a Ferrari to your Mom's 30 year old minivan. But the question is when do you need it over GIMP? I think for many users GIMP is just as usable as PS, most people don't work with CMYK and your non-tilt/angle supporting beginner wacom tablets work just as good in the GIMP as in PS. The CMYK support thing you could say about ancient PS versions and be correct, and yet they added a ton of stuff over the years which isn't mentioned.Īnd that PS is superior is obvious, it's professional software which is heavily financed with dedicated coders working on it that are specifically selected for their talent on the subject. And I suspect that is because most people don't use the many extras PS offers, because after all it takes a lot of studying to learn to use all those options and to understand them. I think it's interesting how little people can say about the actual differences, and there are many.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |